Technical Report: Gravitational Modification and Advanced Levitation
The pursuit of true anti-gravity—the modification of the gravitational field itself—remains a theoretical frontier, while levitation—using countervailing forces to suspend mass—is a proven industrial reality. Current research is divided between incremental engineering in electromagnetics and radical theoretical shifts in quantum vacuum engineering.
00:00
SPEAKER_01: Gravity is the ultimate bully. If you really think about it, it's this invisible, relentless tether we've been fighting since, I don't know, we first tried to stand up. Oh, absolutely. And in the aerospace world. Yeah. It's public enemy number one. It's the whole reason a flight to London takes seven hours and burns tons of fuel. It's the single biggest hurdle to going to Mars. It's the fundamental tax on motion. You pay the gravity tax every single time you lift a finger and the house almost always wins.
00:28
SPEAKER_01: But the stack of sources we're looking at today asks a question that feels almost illegal to ask in polite engineering company. Which is? What if we could just turn it off or, you know, even better, what if we could reverse it? And we're not talking about Star Wars repulsor lists here.
00:43
SPEAKER_01: No, not at all. We are looking at a stack that goes from unclassified defense intelligence agency reports, the DIA, all the way to some really dense papers on superconductivity. And then one truly wild theory about psychic spacecraft. It is quite the spectrum. We're going from like the totally proven hard engineering of German trains to the absolute fringe of theoretical physics where the math starts to feel more like philosophy.
01:11
SPEAKER_01: So the mission today is to find the line. Where does the real science stop and the fiction begin? Let's do it. Okay. So let's start with what we actually know because we do levitate things. We've been doing it for decades. Right. But our first source, a breakdown by Binu Chatterjee, makes a really crucial distinction right at the top. He separates lifting from levitation.
01:34
SPEAKER_00: And that matters. Lifting is just force. Exactly. I can lift a rock. A helicopter lifts itself by just beating the air into submission. But levitation, that implies stable flotation, no contact, just floating. And Chatterjee says we do this right now with maglev trains, but in two totally different ways, the German way and the Japanese way. Yeah. And this is fascinating. I think most people assume all maglevs are just magnets pushing against each other. I did. But the German system, the trans rapid, it's actually pulling up, isn't it?
02:02
SPEAKER_00: It is. It's called electromagnetic levitation or EML. Imagine the track is like a T shape. The train wraps its arms around the top of the T and then tucks them underneath. Okay. And the magnets on the bottom of those arms pull up towards the steel rail. That sounds incredibly unstable. Like if it pulls too hard, it just slams into the track.
02:24
SPEAKER_00: It is inherently unstable. There's a thing in physics called Earnshaw's theorem, which basically says you can't hold a set of magnets in a stable hover using just static fields. They'll always flick or snap together. So the German system is fighting physics. It is. It needs a computer adjusting the magnetic field thousands of times a second just to maintain this tiny one centimeter gap. So if the computer crashes, the train crashes. Well, effectively, yeah. It's designed to land on skids, but you're totally relying on that active control.
02:51
SPEAKER_01: Okay, whereas the Japanese system, the SC maglev, it does the opposite. It pushes, it uses repulsion. Correct. Electrodynamic levitation. And this is where superconductors come in. The physics here is based on something called Lenz's Law. Lenz's Law. Refresh my memory on that one. So...
03:08
SPEAKER_00: Nature hates a change in magnetic flux. If you try to shove a magnetic field through a conductor, the conductor creates its own magnetic field to push back. As the Japanese train rushes past coils in the track, its movement induces a current in those coils. That current creates a mirror magnetic field that just pushes the train up.
03:29
SPEAKER_00: So the faster it goes, the higher it floats. Exactly. And that's what makes it stable. If the train gets too close to the track, the repulsive force gets stronger all by itself. No computer needed. But there's a catch, right? There's a catch. It can't levitate until it hits about 150 kilometers per hour. Before that, it's on rubber wheels, just like an airplane on a runway. And you need all that liquid helium to keep the superconductors freezing cold. Right. It's an engineering marvel, but you're essentially building a cryogenic track across the country.
03:56
SPEAKER_01: So we have active computer control versus passive superconducting physics. But my favorite part of all the passive research has to be the frog. We have to talk about the frog. Andre Geim, 1997. Oh, yeah, this is a classic. He actually levitated a live frog inside a magnetic field. And just to be clear, this is not a trick. There are no strings. The frog is actually genuinely floating inside a tube.
04:18
SPEAKER_00: It is. And it works because of a property called diamagnetism. We think of iron being magnetic, right? It's attractive. Sure. But water is diamagnetic. It slightly repels magnetic fields. And since a frog is mostly water, you put it in a massive 16 Tesla magnet. And that tiny repulsion is enough to fight gravity. And 16 Tesla is monstrous, right? A hospital MRI machine is what? One and a half? Yeah. Standard MRI is 1.5 to 3 Tesla. So this is 5 to 10 times stronger.
04:47
SPEAKER_00: So let's do the math. The source mentions levitating a human. If I wanted to float in my living room, what kind of power are we talking about? You'd need about 40 Tesla. And the energy cost to run that field would be roughly one gigawatt. One. So a nuclear power plant. A nuclear power plant strapped to your back, pretty much. And that's the wall we hit with passive levitation. It works. It's real science. But you can't put that on a spaceship. You're not pushing against gravity itself.
05:14
SPEAKER_01: Right. Which brings us to the heavy hitter in our stack, the Defense Intelligence Agency. They released a document called Anti-Gravity for Aerospace Applications. Now, when the military starts writing reports on anti-gravity, you know they are not looking for floating frogs. They want propulsion. They want the Holy Grail. The document comes right out and says the goal is active gravity control. They don't want to push against the air like a jet or track like a train. They want to push against the fabric of space time itself.
05:43
SPEAKER_00: Because if you can do that, you don't need propellant. You get rid of the giant explosive fuel tank. Exactly. If you can change the local gravity field, you could lift a massive craft with theoretically very little energy. But the report is it's really a catalog of failures. It's a huge reality check. They start with Newton. Right. Yeah. They look at Newtonian physics. And if you want to cancel Earth's gravity just using mass like putting a really dense rock over your head to pull you up, the numbers are just...
06:12
SPEAKER_00: Laughable. The dense ball theory. Yeah. To cancel out Earth's gravity, you'd need a sphere of matter the size of a bowling ball, but with the density of a dwarf star. So millions of tons in a backpack. Not practical. Not happening. So then they look at Einstein, general relativity, we know rotating mass, drag, space-time, the Lenz-Thuring effect.
06:33
SPEAKER_00: Is that the spoon and honey analogy? You spin the spoon and the honey swirls around it. That's the one. So if you spin a dense ring fast enough, it should create a gravitational field. The report looks at a concept by Robert Forward, a kind of coil where you pump mass through pipes instead of electricity. A mass current. That sounds incredibly heavy. It is, and the report does the math. To get just one dree of lift, the matter inside that coil would have to be moving at nearly the speed of light.
07:01
SPEAKER_01: Okay, so we need either dwarf stars or light-speed spinning pipes. It sounds like the DIA is basically saying you can't do this. With classical materials, yes. The physics is real, but the engineering is impossible. But then they open the door to quantum field theory. They start talking about negative energy and the Casimir effect. Okay, this is where my brain starts to hurt a little. How can energy be negative? I get negative money, but negative energy.
07:25
SPEAKER_00: So think of the vacuum of space. We think it's empty, right? Nothingness. Yeah. But quantum mechanics says it's actually this boiling soup of virtual particles popping in and out of existence. Waves of energy. Right. So empty isn't really empty. Exactly. Now, take two metal plates and push them incredibly close together, like nanometers apart. The gap is so small that the longer waves of those virtual particles physically can't fit inside. They're excluded automatically.
07:52
SPEAKER_00: Like trying to fit a tuba in a phone booth. Perfect analogy. So outside the plates, you have all the waves pushing in. Inside, you have fewer waves pushing out. The result is a net pressure. The plates are pushed together. And that deficit of energy inside is negative energy. Effectively, yes. That less than vacuum state. And theoretically, negative energy has antigravitational properties. It should create a repulsive effect on spacetime. And the DIA report admits this is real. We've measured it in the lab.
08:21
SPEAKER_00: So why aren't we flying Casimir ships? What's the problem? Scale. The force is just microscopic. We're talking about 10 to the minus 11 Newtons. It's barely enough to move a speck of dust.
08:35
SPEAKER_01: So the government concludes the math works, the phenomenon is real, but the engineering is just a complete nightmare. Precisely. They're stuck between impossible density on one hand and impossible precision on the other. But while the DIA is wringing its hands over the math, there are people in garages claiming they've already cracked it. We have to talk about the lifters. Oh, yeah. You go on YouTube right now. There are thousands of videos, these little balsa wood triangles flying silently, no moving parts.
09:03
SPEAKER_00: The ionocraft. This is a classic case of mistaken identity. It looks like anti-gravity. It acts like anti-gravity. But it is definitely not anti-gravity. It's just wind. It's an electrical wind. You hook a thin wire up to about 30,000 volts. That high energy strips electrons off the air molecules near the wire. Yeah. And these charged ions then rush down toward a foil skirt at the bottom. And on their way down, they just smash into other air molecules.
09:27
SPEAKER_00: Exactly. They bang into neutral air molecules like a linebacker, clearing a path, creating thrust. It pushes air down, which pushes the craft up. Electrohydrodynamics. Right. And the proof is simple. You put a lifter in a vacuum chamber, turn it on, and nothing.
09:42
SPEAKER_01: Nothing happens. No air, no lift. It's useless in space. So it's a fan with no blades. Cool, but not a space drive. Okay. However, there is one anomaly in our stack that just refuses to go away. It's not a garage hobbyist and it's not the U.S. government. It's a guy named Eugene Podklytnov. Yes. The Podklytnov case. He was a material scientist in Finland and his story involves pipe smoke.
10:07
SPEAKER_00: It does. This is 1992. Pogletnov is working at a university with a spinning superconducting disc. Standard research stuff. But the story goes, a colleague was smoking a pipe in the lab. Which really dates the story. Right. And he blew smoke over the device. But the smoke didn't just drift away. It hit something. It hit an invisible column above the spinning disc and shot straight into the ceiling. Like it hit a chimney. So Pogletnov starts testing it.
10:31
SPEAKER_00: He does. And he claims that anything placed above this spinning disk loses a bit of its weight. How much? Not a lot. About 0.3% to maybe 2%. 2% doesn't sound like a lot. I lose more than that after a good workout. Why is that a big deal? Because in physics, 2% is a universe-shattering violation of the laws of nature.
10:51
SPEAKER_00: Gravity is supposed to be constant. If you could shield it by 2% just by spinning a disc, you've broken general relativity. It means gravity can be engineered. So did he get the Nobel Prize? He got fired. The paper leaked to the press before peer review. The scientific community called it heresy, and his university just expelled him. They wanted nothing to do with it. But the idea didn't die. Our sources mention Boeing had a project called Grass Pea.
11:18
SPEAKER_00: Gravity Research for Advanced Space Propulsion. Boeing has always publicly denied funding it with company money. But the rumor in aerospace has always been that they, and other defense contractors, tried to replicate Podklitnov's work. Because if it's real... It's the biggest discovery since fire. It changes everything.
11:35
SPEAKER_00: And we have an update on him from a Reddit thread from 2025. He's still working on this. Oh, yeah. He hasn't stopped. He's evolved the concept. He's not spinning ceramic disks anymore. Now he's talking about toroidal solenoids, donut-shaped coils pulsing at terahertz frequencies. And he claims this creates a gravitational well in front of the craft. Exactly. Oh, well. So...
12:02
SPEAKER_01: The ship isn't being pushed. It's falling. It's falling upwards. Think about how gravity works, right? Yeah. Mass curves spacetime, creating a slope that you slide down. Puglinov claims he can create that slope artificially just ahead of the craft. So the ship is constantly falling into a hole that it projects in front of itself. That would be a theory. That is incredibly elegant if it's true. And it solves the inertia problem, right? If you're just falling, you don't feel any g-force.
12:26
SPEAKER_00: Theoretically, yeah. You can make a 90 degree turn at Mach 10 and not get turned into jelly on the wall. But there's a catch. There's always a catch. Always. He claims he can lift several kilograms now, which is a big improvement. But the device overheats in about 15 to 20 seconds. So it's the same old story. A massive energy management problem. He can create the effect, but he can't sustain it without melting the rig.
12:47
SPEAKER_01: Which brings us to our final and by far the most radical source in the stack, a paper by Fran de Aquino, a physicist from Brazil. This one. This one just rewrites the definition of mass itself. Yeah. Buckle up for this one. This is where we leave the textbook entirely. De Aquino argues that gravitational mass and inertial mass, which we think are the same thing, can actually be decoupled.
13:09
SPEAKER_00: OK, so inertial mass is how hard it is to push something and gravitational mass is how heavy it is. Right. And Einstein's whole thing was the equivalence principle. They are identical. De Quino says not if you use ELF waves. Extra low frequency waves. He proposes that if you subject an object to a specific high power ELF electromagnetic field, you can reduce its gravitational mass. You can literally dial down how heavy something is without changing how hard it is to push.
13:38
SPEAKER_00: And he describes a gravitational motor based on this idea. Yes. Imagine a giant wheel. On the right side, you apply the ELF waves, making that side lighter. On the left side, it's at normal weight. So gravity pulls the heavy side down, spinning the wheel forever. He calls it free energy. He calculates a small iron rotor could produce about 220 kilowatts, enough to power 20 homes.
14:02
SPEAKER_00: That is an incredibly bold claim. But he also talks about how a spacecraft could use this with the atmosphere. And this part I kind of understood. It's about friction. Right. This is a clever engineering twist. He suggests that if you can manipulate gravity, you could trap a layer of air around your ship, a gravity bubble. So when you're flying at Mach 10, you're not rubbing against the stationary atmosphere, which is what creates all that heat. You're flying inside a pocket of air that's moving with you.
14:27
SPEAKER_00: Friction just drops to zero. Effectively, yeah. Yeah. You create your own personal atmosphere and take it along for the ride. Okay, that sounds like advanced but maybe plausible engineering. But then? The paper takes a hard left turn into the psychic universe. I had to read this section twice. It does get wild. D'Aquino argues that if you reduce the gravitational mass of an object past zero, it doesn't just become negative. It becomes an imaginary number.
14:55
SPEAKER_00: And in the real world, imaginary numbers usually just mean you messed up your math or that this can exist. Usually. But Degano treats it as a real physical state of being. He links imaginary mass to what he calls psychic mass. He argues that a ship in this state exits our local space time and enters a psychic universe.
15:17
SPEAKER_01: So the ship would just disappear. It would become invisible to us. Yeah. It phases out of our reality. And because it's no longer in real space time, the speed of light, which only applies to our universe, no longer applies to it. So that's how you get faster than light travel, by entering a dimension of consciousness. That's the claim. It is a long, long way from the German train tracks we started with. It really is. But if you look at the progression of our sources today, it kind of tells a story, doesn't it? We mastered passive magnetic force. That's the maglev train. Then we hit the energy wall.
15:47
SPEAKER_01: The D.I.A. telling us we need dwarf stars. Pakleknov suggests maybe we can hack the system with the right frequency. And D'Aquino just says we have to leave the material world entirely. It feels like we're trying to break out of a prison. That's a great analogy. No, think about it. Gravity is the bars on the cell. The maglev is like standing on a chair. You're off the floor, but you're still locked in. And the D.I.A. is trying to saw through the bars with brute force, but the saw isn't strong enough.
16:14
SPEAKER_01: Exactly. And D'Aquino, he's suggesting we can just dissolve the prison with our minds. And maybe that's what it will take. The one common thread through all of this is that everyone agrees the current method burning chemical rockets to fight gravity is a dead end. We're all desperate for a loophole. And what's so fascinating to me is that the DIA report admitted the loophole exists. They said negative energy is real. The doors cracked open just a tiny bit.
16:40
SPEAKER_00: It's just a crack. But you have to remember, 100 years ago, flight itself was considered impossible by most serious physicists. Lord Kelvin famously said, heavier than air flying machines are impossible. Just a few years before the Wright brothers took off. And then we figured out the airfoil. We found the loophole. So maybe falling upwards is just one material science breakthrough away. Maybe we just need the right kind of ceramic for Podklitnov's ring. Or just the right frequency for Dequino's field.
17:09
SPEAKER_01: Well, next time you're stuck on the tarmac, crammed into seat 34B waiting for takeoff, just remember, you're doing it the hard way. The math says you could be surfing gravity waves or, you know, phasing into a psychic dimension. We just need to figure out the wiring. Thanks for listening to The Deep Dive. Keep looking up.
00:00
SPEAKER_01: देडीप डाइव में आपका स्वागत है। आज का विशे है एंटी ग्राविटी। मतलब गुरुत्व कर्षण को मात देने की कला। ये एरोस्पेस की दुनिया की शायद सबसे बड़ी चुनौती है। बिल्कुल। गुरुत्व कर्षण हमें नीचे खीचता है। और उससे � तो हमारे पास आज कई दिल्चस्प स्रोत हैं। अमेरिकी रक्षा खुफिया एजन्सी का एक हाल ही में अवरगी कृत किया गया दस्तवेज है। चुम्ब किये लेविटेशन पर एक लेख है। कुछ विवादासपद वैज्ञानिकों पर रिपॉर्ट्स है।
00:37
SPEAKER_00: और गुर्त्वा कर्षण को नियंत्रित करने के कुछ ऐसे सिधान्त भी हैं, जो सच में होश उड़ा देते हैं. हाँ. और हमारा मिशन है इन सभी स्त्रोतों से ग्यान के सबसे ज़रूरी हिस्से निकालना. हम ये पता लगाएंगे कि गुर्त्वा कर्षण पर काबू पाना क्य
00:59
SPEAKER_01: हम स्थापित भौति की यानी जो हम जानते हैं उससे शुरू करेंगे। और फिर धीरे धीरे उन विचारों की ओर बढ़ेंगे जो विज्ञान की सीमाओं को चुनौती देते हैं। चलिए इसे परत दरपरत समझते हैं। सबसे पहले सबसे सीधा सवाल। क्या हम न्यूटन के �
01:20
SPEAKER_00: थियोरी में तो हाँ, रक्षा दस्तावेज में रॉबर्ड फॉरवर्ड नाम के एक वैज्ञानिक के विचार का जिक्र है। कल्पना कीजिए कि हमारे पास कोई ऐसा पदार्थ है, जो बॉने तारे या न्यूट्रॉन तारे जितना घना हो। अगर हम उस पदार्थ की लगब�
01:39
SPEAKER_01: क्या कहा आपने? 32 सेंटिमीटर की गेंद का वजन 40 लाख मीटर टन? ये तो, ये सोचना भी मुश्किल है. बिल्कुल, लेकिन अगर आप ऐसा कर पाते, और उसे पृत्वी की सता के पास रख देते, तो वो पृत्वी के 1G गुरुत्वा कर्षन को पूरी तरह से रद कर देती.
02:08
SPEAKER_00: तो फिर असल दुनिया में हम चीजों को हवा में कैसे तहराते हैं? चुम्बकी ये लेविटेशन, मतलब मैगनेटिक लेविटेशन, वो तो एक जानी मानी तकनीक है. बिल्कुल, हमारे स्रूतों में से एक, बैनू चाक्टर जी का लेख इसे अच्छे से समझाता है, हम सब जा
02:31
SPEAKER_00: लेकिन अर्णशौ की प्रमेय नाम का एक नियम है। वो कहता है कि केवल स्थाई चुम्बकों का उप्योग करके किसी चीज को स्थिर रूप से हवा में तहराना असंभव है। मतलब वो या तो पलट कर छिपक जाएगी या फिर बगल से गिर जाएगी।
02:45
SPEAKER_00: बिल्कुल, स्थिरताई असली चुनावती है। लेकिन इसका एक समाधान है और वो काफी हरान करने वाला है। वो है डाया मैगनेटिज्म। डाया मैगनेटिज्म। हाँ, ये ऐसे पदार्थ हैं जिनने चुम्बकिय शेत्र हलके से धखेलता है। उनसे दूर हटाता है। ग्र अगर चुम्बकिय शेत्र काफी शक्तिशाली हो तो हाँ और यहीं पर एक बहुत मज़ेदार किस्सा आता है। 1997 में आंद्रे गीम नामके एक वैज्ञानिक ने उन्होंने एक जीवित मेंधक को हवा में तैरा दिया था।
03:26
SPEAKER_00: सच में एक तैरता हुआ मेंड़क, आप मज़ाग तो नहीं कर रहे हैं। नहीं, बिल्कुल नहीं। उन्होंने उसे 16 से 20 टेसला के एक बहुत शक्तिशाली चुम्बक के अंदर तैराया था। और मेंड़क को कोई नुकसान भी नहीं हुआ। ये तो कमाल है। मतलब हमारे शरी
03:44
SPEAKER_00: और जब हम सूपर कंडॉक्टर्स की बात करते हैं, तो ये कहानी और भी दिल्चस्प हो जाती है. हाँ, मैंने क्वांटम लेविटेशन के वीडियोस देखे हैं. वो एक छोटी सी डिस्क एक ट्रैक के उपर हवा में घूमती रहती है. वो सूपर कंडॉक्टर्स ही होते हैं, है
04:08
SPEAKER_00: खामिया होती हैं कलपना किजिए कि चुम्बकी शेतर की रेखाएं धागों की तरह हैं ये धागे उन खामियों में जाके पिन हो जाते हैं ये अठक जाते हैं ठीक वैसे ही जैसे आप एक पिन को कॉर्क बोर्ट पर लगा देते हैं अच्छा तो ये सिर्फ तैर नहीं रहा है य
04:31
SPEAKER_00: तो मैगलेव ट्रेने भी इसी तरह हवा में तैरती हैं. मैंने सुना है कि इनकी भी दो अलग-अलग तक्नीके हैं. हाँ, मोटे तौर पर दो तरह की तक्नीके हैं. पहली, जिसे जर्मन प्रनाली या EMS कहते हैं, वो आकरशन या खिचाओ का इस्तेमाल करती है. ट्रेन के नीचे
04:54
SPEAKER_00: सही है और दूसरी है जापानी प्रणाली यानि EGS वो प्रतिकर्षन या धखेलने वाले बल का इस्तमाल करती है ट्रेन में सूपर कंडक्टिंग मैगनेट होते हैं जैसे ही ट्रेन तेजी से चलती है ये पट्री में एक करेंट पैदा करती है ये करेंट एक जवाबी चुम्बक
05:17
SPEAKER_01: बहुत खूब, अब एक और तकनीक है जिसके बारे में मैंने सुना है, आइनो क्राफ्ट या लिफ्टर, लोग इने घर पर भी बनाते हैं, वो एलूमीनियम फॉयल के छोटे छोटे उपकरण होते हैं, जो भिन भिन आते हुए उपर उठते हैं, क्या ये असली एंटी ग्रेव
05:38
SPEAKER_00: तो फिर ये क्या है? स्रोतों के अनुसार ये Electrohydrodynamics या EXD नाम की एक प्रक्रिया है. इसमें एक पतले तार और एलुमिनियम फॉइल के बीच बहुत ज्यादा वोल्टेज लगाया जाता है. ठीक है. ये हवा के अनुवों को आयनित करता है, मतलब उन्हें चार्ज करता है, और
05:58
SPEAKER_00: और न्यूटन के तीसरे यन के मिताबिक हर क्रिया की एक विपरीत प्रतिक्रिया होती है। तो अगर ये हवा को नीचे धखेलता है, तो हवा इसे उपर धखेलती है। बिल्कुल, ये वैक्यूम में काम नहीं करेगा क्योंकि वहाँ धखेलने के लिए हवा ही नहीं है। थॉमस
06:24
SPEAKER_01: तो ये आयनोक्राफ्ट असल में सिर्फ हवा को नीचे धखेल रहे हैं। लेकिन क्या होगा अगर हम हवा या किसी पदार्थ को धखेलने के बजाए खुद स्पेस टाइम को ही धखेलना या मोडना शुरू कर दें। यही पर आइनस्टाइन की दुनिया शुरू होती है न। आ
06:53
SPEAKER_00: एक विचार ग्रैविटो मैगनेटिक फोर्स से आता है। इसका मतलब है कि घूमती हुई चीजें अपने चारों और स्पेस टाइम को खीचती हैं। जैसे पानी में घूमता हुआ चम्मच अपने चारों और पानी को खीचता है। तो क्या हम इसका इस्तमाल एक अंतरिक्ष या
07:13
SPEAKER_00: थियरी में हाँ. रक्षा दस्तावेज में फिर से रॉबर्ट फॉरवर्ड के डाइपोल ग्राविटेशनल फील्ड जेनरेटर का जिक्र है. यह एक डोनट के आकार के पाइप में बहुत घने पदार्थ को तेजी से घुमा कर एक गुर्तो अकर्शक शेत्र बनाने का विचार ह
07:39
SPEAKER_01: फिर से वही कहानी, थियोरी में शानदार, लेकिन असलियत में नामुम्किन. क्या सामान्य सापेक्षता हमें कोई और उम्मित की किरण दिखाती है? हाँ, और ये शायद सबसे दिल्चस्प है, रनात्मक उर्जा की अवधारना. रनात्मक उर्जा? नेगिटिव एनर्जी, ये
08:01
SPEAKER_00: ये असल में मौजूद है लेकिन बहुत छोटी मात्रा में। इसका सबसे प्रसिद्ध उधारण है कासीमीर प्रभाव। कासीमीर प्रभाव। हाँ, अगर आप वैक्यूम में दो पतली प्लेटों को एक दूसरे के बहुत करीब ले आएं, तो उनके बीच क्वांटम उतार-च
08:25
SPEAKER_01: अच्छा, मतलब ये असली है, लेकिन बहुत चोटा. इतना चोटा कि हम इससे कोई कार नहीं उठा सकते. सही का. इसका एक और बड़ा उधारन है Dark Energy. ये एक ऐसी रहस्यमी उर्जा है, जो पूरे ब्रह्मान में पहली हुई है, और ब्रह्मान के विस्तार की गती को तेज कर रह
08:46
SPEAKER_01: हाँ है तो, लेकिन ये इतनी पहली हुई है कि हमारे सौर मंडल के अंदर इसका कोई असर महसूस नहीं होता। तो स्थापित भौति की हमें दिल्चस्प रास्ते तो दिखाती है, लेकिन हर रास्ते के आगे एक बहुत बली असंभव दिवार खड़ी है।
09:02
SPEAKER_00: पर कुछ लोग ऐसे भी हैं जिन्होंने दावा किया कि उन्होंने उस दीवार को तोड़ दिया है। चलिए उस विवादासपद कहानी पर आते हैं। यूजीन पॉटकलेटनौफ एक रूसी एंजिनियर जो 1990 के दशक में मशूर हुए। उन्होंने दावा किया कि जब वो एक स
09:26
SPEAKER_00: वजन कम हो गया था एक किस्सा तो ये भी है कि उन्होंने देखा कि पास में किसी के पाइप का धुआ वो डिस्क के उपर से गुजरते हुए छट की तरफ एक सीधी रेखा में जा रहा था जैसे कोई अद्रिश्य बीम उसे उपर खीच रही हो
09:39
SPEAKER_00: ये तो सुनने में किसी फिल्म के सीन जैसा लगता है। उन्होंने कितनों वजन कमोने का दावा किया था। अब ने 1996 के एक पेपर में उन्होंने 2% तक की कमी का दावा किया। ये पेपर एक प्रतिष्ठित जर्नल में छपने वाला था। लेकिन छपने से पहले ही लीक हो गया�
10:00
SPEAKER_00: और फिर हंगामा खड़ा हो गया होगा। बिल्कुल, एक बड़ा विवाद छिड़ गया। पेपर के सहलेखक ने अपना नाम वापस ले लिया। पोर्ट क्लेटनॉफ को उनकी प्रयोग साला से निकाल दिया गया। अफ़वाएं थीं कि बोईंग जैसी बड़ी कंपनियां ग
10:24
SPEAKER_00: लेकिन कहानी यहां खतम नहीं होती, हमारे सोर्सेज में 2025 का एक नया अपडेट है, जो हाल ही की जानकारी है. हाँ, एक सुरोत के अनुसार, पुर्टकलेटनॉफ ने 2025 में एक नए प्रयोग का वर्णन किया है. इसमें, टेरा हर्ट्स फ्रीक्वेंसी रेंज में काम करने वाले �
10:53
SPEAKER_01: लेकिन उनके इस नए विचार में सबसे अजीब बात क्या है? सबसे दिल्चस बात यह है कि वो इसे प्रतिकर्षन, यानि धकेलने वाला प्रभाव नहीं बताते. वो कहते हैं कि डिवाइस अपने उपर एक गुरुत्वाकर्षन कूहा बनाता है. एक मिनट रुके, गुरुत्
11:20
SPEAKER_00: बिल्कुल, और यही इस विचार को इतना अनोखा और विवादासपत बनाता है. यह गुरुत्वा करशन के बारे में हमारी पारमपरिक समझ को पूरी तरह से चुनोती देता है. यह कहना कि आप गुरुत्वा करशन में उपर की और गिर रहे हैं, यह भोतिकी की हमारी मौझू
11:38
SPEAKER_01: ठीक है, उपर की ओर गिरना मेरे दुमाग को पहले ही घुमा रहा है। लेकिन हमारे स्रोतों में एक और सिध्धान्त है, जो इससे भी आगे जाता है। ये फ्रान डी एक्वीनो नाम के एक सिध्धान्तकार का है, और ये सचमुच साइंस फिक्षिन के दायरे में चला जाता है
12:08
SPEAKER_00: उनका दावा है कि इन दोनों के बीच के संबंद को खास तरह के विध्यु चुम्बिकीय शेत्रों का उपयोग करके बदला जा सकता है। अगर हम ऐसा कर सकें, तो इसका क्या मतलब होगा? जड़त्विय द्रव्यमान को नियंत्रित करने का क्या असर होगा?
12:22
SPEAKER_00: इसके प्रभाव बहुत बड़े होंगे। पहला है गुरुत्वा कर्षन शील्डिंग। एक अंतरिक्ष यान अपने चारों ओर एक ऐसा बुलबुला बना सकता है जो बाहरी ब्रह्मांड के साथ उसके गुरुत्वा कर्षन संपर्क को लगभग शून्य कर दे। और माखे के स
12:47
SPEAKER_01: जड़ता हीन, मतलब वो बिना किसी जी फोर्स के अचानक रुक सकता है या समकोण पर मुड सकता है, जैसे हम यूएफो की कहानियों में सुनते हैं। बिल्कुल, चालक दल को बिना कोई नुकसान पहुचाए यान बहुत तेजी से गती बढ़ा सकता है, लेकिन ये यही नहीं �
13:09
SPEAKER_00: उनका सिद्धान्त कहता है कि यदि आप किसी वस्तु के गुरुत्वा कर्षन द्रव्यमान को एक निश्चित सीमा तक कम कर देते हैं, तो उसका द्रव्यमान काल्पनिक हो जाता है। एक मिनिट, काल्पनिक द्रव्यमान, काल्पनिक स्पेस टाइम, ये तो किसी साइंस फिक्�
13:32
SPEAKER_00: ये मुख्यधारा की भौतिकी से बहुत दूर है। लेकिन डी एक्विनो का तरक है कि उनके समिकरण इसकी अनुमती देते हैं। उनके अनुसार, जब दर्व्यमान काल्पनिक हो जाता है, तो वस्तु हमारे सामान्य ब्रह्मान्ड से गायब हो जाती है और काल्पनिक स्पेस ट
13:56
SPEAKER_00: सिद्धान्त रूप में हाँ, एक अंतरिक्ष्यान काल्पनिक स्पेस टाइम में प्रवेश कर सकता है, अविश्वसनिय गती से यात्रा कर सकता है, और फिर अपने गंतव्य के पास हमारे ब्रह्मान में फिर से प्रकड़ हो सकता है. वाओ! वो इस काल्पनिक शेत्र को मानसिक �
14:19
SPEAKER_01: वाकई, आज हमने क्या अविश्वसनिय यात्रा की है। हमने न्यूटन के 40 लाख टन के असंभव गोले और असल दुनिया की मैगलेव ट्रेनों से शुरुवात की। फिर हमने आइंस्टाइन के मुड़े हुए स्पेस टाइम और एक तैरते हुए मिंधक जैसी क्वांटम वि�
14:38
SPEAKER_00: और हमने यूजीन पॉट क्लिटिनॉफ की विवादासपत कहानी और गुर्तवा कर्षन में उपर की और गिरने के उनके दिमाग चक्रा देने वाले नए विचार को भी देखा। और अंत में हमने फ्रैंडी एक्यूएनो के लगभग जड़ता हीन अंतरिक्षियान और कालपनि
14:54
SPEAKER_01: इन सभी स्रोतों को एक साथ रखने पर ये एक बहुत बड़ा सवाल छोड़ जाता है. अगर इनसान कभी गुर्तवा कर्षन को नियंत्रित करने में काम्याब होता है, तो वो सफलता कहां से आएगी? क्या ये उन चीजों को बहतर बनाने से आएगी, जैसे सूपर कंडक्टर्स
1. Theoretical Foundations of Anti-Gravity
Theoretical physics allows for gravitational repulsion under specific mathematical solutions, though experimental evidence is often lacking or controversial.
- Quantised Inertia (QI): Proposed by Mike McCulloch, this model suggests inertia is not intrinsic but caused by Unruh radiation. As an object accelerates, a Rindler horizon forms, creating an asymmetric radiation pressure that opposes motion. This theory aims to explain galactic rotation without dark matter and has received $1.3 million in DARPA funding to test propellant-less propulsion prototypes.
- Repulsive Gravity and Dark Energy: In General Relativity, negative pressure acts as a source of repulsive gravity. On a cosmological scale, dark energy exhibits this effect, driving the expansion of the universe, though its density is too low for local propulsion applications.
- Negative Mass: A hypothetical "exotic matter" with mass of an opposite sign would be gravitationally repulsive. While mathematically consistent in General Relativity, no macroscopic negative mass has been observed.
2. Proven Levitation Modalities
Unlike anti-gravity, levitation does not alter the metric of space-time; instead, it provides a stable upward force.
| Levitation Method | Physical Basis | Key Mechanism |
|---|---|---|
| Magnetic (Maglev) | Magnetic Fields | Attraction (EMS) or Repulsion (EDS). |
| Superconducting | Meissner Effect | Below a critical temperature ($T_c$), superconductors expel magnetic fields, achieving perfect diamagnetism ($\chi = -1$). |
| Acoustic | Sound Waves | High-frequency ultrasonic standing waves create pressure nodes where objects can be suspended. |
| Diamagnetic | Repulsion of B-fields | Stable suspension using materials like pyrolytic graphite or the water in biological organisms (e.g., levitating frogs). |
Stability Note: Earnshaw's Theorem states that static ferromagnetic systems cannot achieve stable equilibrium without active electronic regulation or the use of diamagnetic materials. Flux pinning in Type-II superconductors provides "quantum locking," allowing for stable suspension even when the system is inverted.
3. Experimental Anomalies and Controversies
Several high-profile claims of "anti-gravity" have been attributed to other physical phenomena after rigorous testing.
- The Podkletnov Effect: In the 1990s, Eugene Podkletnov claimed that a rotating superconducting disk produced a 0.05% to 2% weight reduction in objects above it. NASA and other institutions failed to replicate the effect with high fidelity. In 2025, Podkletnov reported new experiments using toroidal solenoids to create "gravitational wells".
- The Biefeld–Brown Effect: Inventor Thomas Townsend Brown claimed that high-voltage asymmetric capacitors produced anti-gravity. Subsequent vacuum chamber studies by NASA and other researchers concluded that the thrust was actually caused by ion wind (corona discharge) and disappears in a vacuum.
- Antimatter Gravitation: Theoretical speculation that antimatter might repel normal matter was ruled out in 2023 by CERN, which confirmed that antihydrogen falls "down" in Earth's gravity.
4. Emerging Technologies (2024–2026)
The field is transitioning from laboratory research to commercial and military investigation.
- Quantum Drives: IVO Ltd launched the Bally1 satellite in 2023 to test "Quantum Drives" based on QI theory in a microgravity environment.
- Acoustic Levitation SaaS: Platforms have emerged to provide contactless handling for pharmaceutical and electronics manufacturing, reducing microchip damage rates by up to 87%.
- Superconductor Market: Driven by fusion and transport projects, the global market for superconductors is projected to reach $16.4 billion by 2030.
Would you like me to expand on any specific section, such as the mathematical equations for Quantised Inertia or the industrial ROI of acoustic levitation platforms, before you save this?